Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:41:02 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Making use of set_rcvar. Message-ID: <20120109134101.GD4117@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <4F0AC0BF.3050709@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F079A76.3030306@FreeBSD.org> <20120107112538.GC1696@garage.freebsd.pl> <4F08C95F.6040808@FreeBSD.org> <20120108.081216.1547061187942402256.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0A22D8.8090206@FreeBSD.org> <4F0AB60E.7090601@freebsd.org> <20120109102129.GA4117@garage.freebsd.pl> <4F0AC0BF.3050709@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:26:07AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 02:21, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:40:30AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >> Am 09.01.2012 00:12, schrieb Doug Barton:
> >>> Attached is a patch that does what I suggested a long time ago, remov=
es
> >>> set_rcvar() entirely and assigns each rcvar statically. I'll commit t=
his
> >>> in a few days if no one objects. (Note, it can't be committed yet
> >>> because the scripts in ports that call set_rcvar() have to be modified
> >>> first.)
> >> [...]
> >>> Index: rc.d/nscd
> >>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >>> --- rc.d/nscd (revision 229825)
> >>> +++ rc.d/nscd (working copy)
> >>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> >>> . /etc/rc.subr
> >>>
> >>> name=3D"nscd"
> >>> -rcvar=3D`set_rcvar`
> >>> +rcvar=3D"nscd_enable"
> >>
> >> Why not generally use
> >>
> >> rcvar=3D"${name}_enable"
> >>
> >> instead of (e.g.)
> >>
> >> rcvar=3D"nscd_enable"
> >>
> >> in all scripts *in your patch set*, for which the outcome is the same?
> >=20
> > I fully agree. There is one less thing to change after reusing a script.
> > I can't see how this might be a bad idea, really.
>=20
> See my previous response.
I saw your e-mail before agreeing with Stefan's proposal. And let me
repeat myself: I can't see how this might be a bad idea. Do you?
--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com
--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk8K7m0ACgkQForvXbEpPzRDiQCgww/Cmw8WnGw2+E9gv9vgGemk
hxIAoOmiuXrWp3msQiuBeY0wqc7VJwn9
=fi3p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0/kgSOzhNoDC5T3a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120109134101.GD4117>