Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:15:34 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?6Z+T5a625qiZIEJpbGwgSGFja2Vy?= <askbill@conducive.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "conatainer" Message-ID: <47495956.3040604@conducive.net> In-Reply-To: <20071125105818.I63238@fledge.watson.org> References: <4746C893.1090305@raad.tartu.ee> <20071125105818.I63238@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Toomas Aas wrote: >> ...and so on. A lot of aac debug messages talk about "Conatainer" >> something or other. Shouldn't it be "Container"? English is not my >> native language, so I didn't want to file a PR in case there actually >> is a word "conatainer" in English language. There probably is such a construct in one of the many forms of 'English' - as in 'con the attainer'. But it would be a socio-political term (and much in evidence these days), not suitable for use in coding.. ;-) Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47495956.3040604>