Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:58:08 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Ganbold Tsagaankhuu <ganbold@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: major update to if_ure Message-ID: <20200824205808.GI4213@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGtf9xNzWRT_saBykFiAx1V%2BvbB=yE6wDxX%2BYj4_DrANdfPp9Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20200725231318.GO4213@funkthat.com> <CAGtf9xOdpzKqKBUfsDU9nTvN%2BXV4khWgUHCXB02hen_qbyQURw@mail.gmail.com> <20200726211447.GQ4213@funkthat.com> <CAGtf9xMrbvSXnF0560faB4g%2B0RnAfAdamD8WMgW6SdM8-spm9A@mail.gmail.com> <20200727183503.GW4213@funkthat.com> <CAGtf9xNzWRT_saBykFiAx1V%2BvbB=yE6wDxX%2BYj4_DrANdfPp9Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 16:27 +0800:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:35 AM John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote:
>
> > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 18:29 +0800:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:14 AM John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ganbold Tsagaankhuu wrote this message on Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:05
> > +0800:
> > > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:13 AM John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like people who have ure (RealTek) based USB devices to test
> > > > > > review D25809[0].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This update adds support for:
> > > > > > - HW VLAN tagging
> > > > > > - HW checksum offload for IPv4 and IPv6
> > > > > > - tx and rx aggreegation (for full gige speeds)
> > > > > > - multiple transactions
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my testing, I am able to get 900-950Mbps depending upon
> > > > > > TCP or UDP, which is a significant improvement over the previous
> > > > > > 91Mbps (~8kint/sec*1500bytes/packet*1packet/int).
> > > > >
> > > > > Does performance improve for if_ure device on USB2?
> > > > > I will try to test it in a couple of days on NanoPI R1 and R1S
> > boards.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it should.
> > > >
> > > > I never tested the before driver on USB2, but I'm now able to get
> > > > 211Mbps TX and 190Mbps RX TCP, and 227Mbps TX and 225Mbps RX UDP.
> > > >
> > > > I believe it is likely that the same 91Mbps speed limit applied to
> > > > USB2 as well.
> > >
> > > Couldn't find your iperf test scripts and I tested only tcp:
> >
> > My test script isn't performance, just features, and I'm thinking about
> > how/where to publish it...
> >
> > You can also test UDP using -u w/ iperf3 and adjust the bandwidth w/
> > -b 300m (or other Mbps)...
> >
> > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # iperf3 -c 192.168.111.1
> > > Connecting to host 192.168.111.1, port 5201
> > > [ 5] local 192.168.111.10 port 28569 connected to 192.168.111.1 port
> > 5201
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
> > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 27.4 MBytes 230 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 27.7 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0 95.4 KBytes
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 276 MBytes 232 Mbits/sec 0
> > sender
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.79 sec 276 MBytes 215 Mbits/sec
> > > receiver
> > >
> > > iperf Done.
> > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # iperf3 -c 192.168.111.1 -R
> > > Connecting to host 192.168.111.1, port 5201
> > > Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.111.1 is sending
> > > [ 5] local 192.168.111.10 port 29384 connected to 192.168.111.1 port
> > 5201
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> > > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec
> > > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> > > [ 5] 0.00-11.25 sec 121 MBytes 90.3 Mbits/sec 2539
> > > sender
> > > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 121 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec
> > > receiver
> > >
> > > iperf Done.
> > > root@nanopi-r1s-h5:~ # sysctl -a | grep cpu.0.freq
> > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1248/-1 1008/-1 816/-1 624/-1 480/-1
> > > dev.cpu.0.freq: 1248
> >
> > Hmmm... The reverse seems slow, but I can't think of why it'd be that
> > slow though. When I did my tests on the USB2 ports, both directions
> > were about the same speed...
> >
> > Thanks for the test! Great to hear things are working...
>
> When can you commit it?
Plan on committing it this week...
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200824205808.GI4213>