Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:18:30 -0700 From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> To: John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: There is currently no usable release of FreeBSD. Message-ID: <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
What’s the problem with using ‘legacy’? Tony On Jun 4, 2014, at 9:52 AM, John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> wrote: > > freebsd.org website shows the following: > > Production: 10.0 > Legacy: 9.2, 8.4 > Upcoming: 9.3 > > You can't put an x.0 release into production (a bigotry that is *well deserved* in light of 5.0 and 9.0) ... and 9.2 and 8.4 are legacy ... and we all know that 9.3 is as far as the 9 branch is going to go, so that's a dead end for any serious deployment. > > Let's pretend for a moment that you are going to use FreeBSD for something other than FreeBSD development. Let's pretend that you have customers and shareholders and boardmembers and contracts and regulators. > > Which version of FreeBSD would you use ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51>