Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:19:19 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: perforce@freebsd.org, User Takawata <takawata@axe-inc.co.jp> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 21897 for review Message-ID: <XFMail.20021204121919.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20021204071432.GA1920@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04-Dec-2002 Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:37:20PM +0900, User Takawata wrote: >> In message <200212040607.gB467dlf011494@repoman.freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar >> wrote: >> >> > I renamed rsdt to sdt where it makes sense, but long >> > exposure to ACPI tends to annihilate ones sensibility :-) >> >> SDT is the acronym for System Descriptor Table and not only for >> RSDT or XSDT. I think the name 'rootsdt' is better. > > [I'm amazed by the exposure my work has, while I don't get to see > any changes from others. Probably some configuration thingy...] > > I see. If rootsdt is what it is, then rsdt isn't really a bad name > (provided of course we abstract the fact that xsdt is just a > 64-bit variant of the rootsdt). > > Do you think I should revert back to rsdt or should I convert] > to rootsdt? I think just going back to rsdt would be best. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20021204121919.jhb>