Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:48:06 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp@bank-pedersen.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111247490.29879-100000@zeppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpitlghw52.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes: > > > Since you guys are in docco mode, you might as well document how one > > > detects a devfs system in a running system. > > Why should you care? > > Because if the system doesn't have devfs, the userland vinum code > needs to create the device nodes "manually". Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you use vinum. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111247490.29879-100000>