Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:58:31 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: kostikbel@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brandelf and LINUXBASE/usr/libexec Message-ID: <lnvqj9etphyhi6mugq4fkmjc.1323806311840@email.android.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I read this as old unbranded linux binaries can still reboot the system out of the blue. As such I would say that we should keep the good example of branding of linux binaries (business as usual). Bye, Alexander. -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries is resolved in all supported branches? > The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely branded. > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec. > > Should those files be branded to linux? > I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1)) > for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with > relatively modern Linux toolchain.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lnvqj9etphyhi6mugq4fkmjc.1323806311840>