Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 10:47:16 -0500 From: Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@xonix.com> To: Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au, gjohnson@nola.srrc.usda.gov, taoka@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules Message-ID: <37039504.BDCF7A6C@xonix.com> References: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904020104270.20365-100000@bragg> <199904011545.HAA55582@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How about "natural sciences"? --Ugen Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> > > * On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Glenn Johnson wrote: > * > * > I would think this should go in ports/biology. > * > * ports/chemistry would be better suited, if it existed. There's not very much > > I don't mind have a ports/chemistry except there appears to be a fair > amount of overlap between it and biology. > > * in biology - perhaps we should move them to a new 'scientific' category and > * have 'biology', 'chemistry', 'physics', etc as virtuals (as appropriate). > * We're not likely to have all that many ports in each of the categories, but it > * beats misfiling them :) > > The only problem is that "scientific" would include (at least) math. > I wish there's a good word that just covers the three fields you > mentioned. > > -W To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37039504.BDCF7A6C>