Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:17:08 -0800 From: jgh@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-git@freebsd.org Subject: question regarding git branches Message-ID: <24571d35d243bfd67dbefcbac61f8c7e@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, I am a little late to the dance with git in respect to FreeBSD (haven't been following as much as I would like to given availability), but have been using it for awhile now at work and personally. With the recent migration from svn to git for documentation I saw that there was only one branch named "main." I think this is great that we also went with this name. My question more so is around workflow. Typically, it is seen as good practice to commit to a new branch and then merge to the main branch. Is this something that is being done as part of the commit process, or are commits being done straight to main branch? I'm not sure I need to go into the reasoning of having multiple branches and what that can do insofar as community and mentoring support, development CI/CD pipelines, etc. If this conversation goes down this path, though, I would be more than happy to discuss along with others. Thanks in advance! -jgh [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEjg3EV5oPyRwj8wRUIFmaY0FQ09wFAl/RaQYACgkQIFmaY0FQ 09wKFAgAllTCbrJA07o7bvEZFpsUUUryheFWANQN6ghaficQ+RsSK9aIGidKzg7b bABtBgdf1MThzkAVQwMjrTeCPoT/pZY8VjFaESO8vPYnUa1DokwQaFTxSOqCNHj+ cihOGkLpwR3Yf76HhfRGgj3mK5khO+eAAxTQOROHsemGKOczjgTrLpcvCHYOQMY2 ZgAugqHRsa4TcmH1y2AuuDRDS84it9I7zbbcV1Wpjx9ITiFBOtpMPpSseXW7y+YZ nS0B7vbD0dJ26nJsqzAeu4CYX38RcYd5XEb8V56rkpvDGdByP5QS6cwq0Eb3aiSr 6sCuKzUqiF7D8dnFpL5fkODX9VGVew== =Qq23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24571d35d243bfd67dbefcbac61f8c7e>