Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:32:34 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1
Message-ID:  <20030702203234.GB43809@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030702185229.GA22122@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
References:  <200307011257.h61Cvr0j074180@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030701171328.GA6789@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030702071850.GA58755@sunbay.com> <20030702081951.GA19646@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030702093910.GA74796@sunbay.com> <20030702185229.GA22122@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:52:29AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:39:10PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > if incompatible from the target. The compiler is now built
> > > second and I'm expecting that all tools built after it will
> > > not run. Unless something changed since the last time I looked.
> > >=20
> > The cross-compiler is installed into WORLDTMP which is part of
> > XPATH.  XPATH only appears in PATH for WMAKEENV and IMAKEENV.
>=20
> Ok. I guess we dont need the cross-binutils in WORDTMP when we
> build the cross-compiler. That was one of the original requirements.
>=20
No we don't, we can't use it, it may be for a different arch.

> > To summarize, we don't use any of cross-tools before the
> > _includes stage of buildworld.  But we use some of bootstrap-
> > tools (mostly legacy: bits) in the cross-tools stage.
>=20
> We also used to use bootstrap tools while building bootstrap tools.
> To upgrade from 3.x to 4.x, yacc had to be rebuilt before we built
> bison (IIRC). We don't built bison anymore, but the dependency may
> still be there.
>=20
Hmm, at least groff and config(8) use yacc(1) for building,
and groff now comes before yacc.

I will re-test building of 5.x on 4.0-RELEASE to see if this
change broke this, and report here.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software Ltd,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer

--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/A0FiUkv4P6juNwoRAr04AJ9Y1Mttlvo1eywNZ7aNOA9/onLprQCfarKR
dNc5xD1Vpqx56o5EZLFwTWc=
=MJa+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yNb1oOkm5a9FJOVX--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030702203234.GB43809>