Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:33:38 +0100
From:      Kevin Smith <kerbzo@gmail.com>
To:        Oleg Bulyzhin <oleg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com>
Subject:   Re: dummynet issues
Message-ID:  <4B156F92.6020500@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091201173411.GA3637@lath.rinet.ru>
References:  <4B129960.9030107@gmail.com> <4B12B6B9.3030106@bsd.com.br> <4B12C32F.3060709@gmail.com> <4B12C543.2070204@mgwigglesworth.net> <4B141A77.4030102@gmail.com> <20091130201222.GC72710@lath.rinet.ru> <A173B0FA-C964-431C-8DAF-AE4159065111@wanderview.com> <20091130234537.GA78185@lath.rinet.ru> <CB8F37F2-3DF6-4548-8131-9B96F49D29D6@wanderview.com> <20091201173411.GA3637@lath.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
>> I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet.  I have simply observed these messages repeating in my log:
>>
>>   dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
>>
>> Under normal conditions I don't really need the dummynet rules to shape traffic for my configuration to work, so it has not been a high priority for me yet.  Do you see the log messages?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Ben
> 
> It seems i've found the problem. Please test attached patch (it's for R8.0
> sources and include r198845). I'm interested in some feedback:
> 1) does it solve 'OUCH' messages problem?
> 2) does it solve bandwidth problem (if there was any)?
> 
> 
The patch fixes the problem: now it seems all ok, no more "OUCH"
messages and pipe bandwidth limiting works again.
Thank you very much, Oleg!!
Best regards,

--
Kevin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B156F92.6020500>