Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:45:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>, <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Fate of /usr/share/doc/smm/10.named Message-ID: <20020701134446.E24940-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <3D20A868.9FCAE4B8@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > I agree with this reasoning, and also with keeping them around
> > "somewhere." The BOG is a particularly good candidate for pruning since
> > it's still available from the vendor.
>
> Things that are brought in on vendor branches should be identical
> to the contents of packages distributed by the vendors themselves.
This is already not true because we delete a lot of other code that we
don't use, like ports for other OS'.
> Any time you move away from what the vendor supplied, you increase
> the number of extra delatas you have to think about the next time
> there is a vendor release, and you go to import it.
That's why I updated FREEBSD-Xlist. :)
--
"We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory."
- George W. Bush, President of the United States
State of the Union, January 28, 2002
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020701134446.E24940-100000>