Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:29:50 +0800 From: blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RiscV tinderbox fails Message-ID: <CALM2mEkgWNWo9EEMbGhwZ%2B-ShJ6Y9=Hbq1JSYbrUExizWJy3zA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <39E9E542-8690-40AA-92D3-DA5523DE6FDD@FreeBSD.org> References: <611243783F62AF48AFB07BC25FA4B10629917799@DLDEFFMIMP01EXC.intra.dlr.de> <39E9E542-8690-40AA-92D3-DA5523DE6FDD@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems to be that the FreeBSD implementation of the RISC-V has stalled and development is only proceeding on Linux with GCC. In my opinion FreeBSD forget GCC and work on implementing RISC-V backend for the llvm project. On Sat, Jun 30, 2018, 08:18 Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 29 Jun 2018, at 13:33, Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de wrote: > > > > is it supposed not to fail? I get: > > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc.a(comparedf2.o): In > function > > `__gedf2': > > /usr/src/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/comparedf2.c:101: multiple > definition > > of `__gedf2' > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a(gedf2.o):/usr/src/lib/libc/s > > oftfloat/gedf2.c:18: first defined here > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc.a(comparedf2.o): In > function > > `__eqdf2': > > /usr/src/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/comparedf2.c:127: multiple > definition > > of `__eqdf2' > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a(eqdf2.o):/usr/src/lib/libc/s > > oftfloat/eqdf2.c:18: first defined here > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc.a(comparedf2.o): In > function > > `__ltdf2': > > /usr/src/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/comparedf2.c:127: multiple > definition > > of `__ltdf2' > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a(ltdf2.o):/usr/src/lib/libc/s > > oftfloat/ltdf2.c:18: first defined here > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc.a(comparedf2.o): In > function > > `__nedf2': > > /usr/src/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/comparedf2.c:127: multiple > definition > > of `__nedf2' > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a(nedf2.o):/usr/src/lib/libc/s > > oftfloat/nedf2.c:18: first defined here > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libgcc.a(comparedf2.o): In > function > > `__gtdf2': > > /usr/src/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/comparedf2.c:142: multiple > definition > > of `__gtdf2' > > > /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64sf/tmp/usr/lib/libc.a(gtdf2.o):/usr/src/lib/libc/s > > oftfloat/gtdf2.c:18: first defined here > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > *** [nologin.full] Error code 1 > > As far as I know, it has been broken for quite some time. I guess for > riscv those functions need to be defined either in libc, or in > compiler-rt, but not both... > > -Dimitry > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALM2mEkgWNWo9EEMbGhwZ%2B-ShJ6Y9=Hbq1JSYbrUExizWJy3zA>