Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:34:58 +0600 From: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos PROBLEMS ParseBuffer.c README README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c cp437-8x14.pcf.gz.uu cp437-8x16.pcf.gz.uu ... Message-ID: <20040325053458.GA83603@samodelkin.net> In-Reply-To: <20040325051334.GB44484@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200403232227.i2NMRQn5042762@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324164155.GA4737@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040325051334.GB44484@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:13:34AM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > des 2004/03/23 14:27:26 PST > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.bin Makefile > > > Removed files: > > > usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos > > ... > > > Log: > > > Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in the ports tree. > > > > Did you *really* have consensus for this?? Several committers said it > > worked fine and some said they'd like it to remain in /usr/src. > > FWIW, I agree with David here.. I also had plans for improving doscmd > some time in a near future. Right now, I feel a bit discouraged. What's wrong about improving doscmd in ports? /fjoe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325053458.GA83603>