Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:08:21 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The eventual fate of BLOCK devices. 
Message-ID:  <986.940291701@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:44:34 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910181308270.24435-100000@current1.whistle.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910181308270.24435-100000@current1.whistle.com>, Jul
ian Elischer writes:
>
>Here's something that needs to be solved before Block devices can go away:
>
>Fsck on / in single user mode is presently done of the block device
>so that if fsck  changes any blocks that are presently cached by the
>filesystem, they get updated for the filesystem. 

No it isn't.  Search for MNT_RELOAD in ufs/ffs.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?986.940291701>