Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:20:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Yoshihiro Koya <Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA Message-ID: <20010320202031.A29237@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp>; from Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:45:22AM %2B0900 References: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:45:22AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > I can understand that CPUTYPE isn't used for building > the kernel on 4-stable. Thanks. > > But, I have still a question. > The compilation of the kernel itself is free from the effects of > CPUTYPE, but the kernel modules may be compiled with -march=SOMECPU > as I repoted in my previous message. > It seems to cause some inconsistency in the future, I guess. > Is my thought wrong? Module builds use CFLAGS, not COPTFLAGS..that's just the way it is, I'm not sure why. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6uCwPWry0BWjoQKURAts9AJoCArgZBTbLiy4cgrcaElsRUJk5eACg71B0 Vewg4ELMb/uSTLnr0kBOKYg= =lLcC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010320202031.A29237>