Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 00:59:30 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Chris Rees <crees@bayofrum.net> Cc: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>, freebsd ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Delete a port Message-ID: <5B65E982.90103@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnN_DcRerExsaBhvU7LQuSDa1nDha7Li4mPL5FoCO%2BnNQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <a48a6cd2-e088-618a-61e6-909f71ce8ba5@fechner.net> <20180804140317.GA22029@blogreen.org> <5B65B4FB.70103@grosbein.net> <30EF106C-0794-4A24-918E-FE3132F8A632@bayofrum.net> <CAF6rxgnN_DcRerExsaBhvU7LQuSDa1nDha7Li4mPL5FoCO%2BnNQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
05.08.2018 0:42, Eitan Adler wrote: >> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to vi? > > Why? Would't one want to respect the user's preference when it comes > to an editor? This preference is implicit when it comes to PATH. This is traditional overcautiousness against user's possibly insecure PATH having current directory that can lead to running malignant /tmp/vi in multiuser environment. Eugene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B65E982.90103>