Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:44:26 -0600 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-tiff port update Message-ID: <4222939A.9070808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050226151113.00ec3099@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200502191157.06108.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <20050226124625.5a336b16@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <200502262248.16121.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <20050226151113.00ec3099@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/26/05 8:11 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hello security team, is this an error in the vuln.xml document or is the > commit log of the port-Makefile misleading It's our bad. It looks like we mistakenly believed the FreeBSD package version numbers were aligned between tiff and linux-tiff. > (and Suse is still > vulnerable, since they don't offer newer packages)? No, these issues are fixed in those packages. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4222939A.9070808>