Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:39:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Message-ID: <bug-239682-21738-NzPbIRuR0n@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #29 from Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> --- Let's also look at the timeline: September 19th: 9.0.0 was released September 25th: llvm90 port was updated to 9.0.0 release September 28th: LLVM_DEFAULT bumped. 3 days is too fast. It broke things like llvm (I burned half a day digging = out from that mess after I updated after the packages were built). It couldn't = have possibly been tested in just 3 days. Finally, the exprun for FreeBSD base has kept it from upgrading to 9.0 beca= use the fallout from this upgrade is too large. Let that sink in: we can't upgr= ade base because llvm 9.0 is too broken. And yet it got rushed in just before t= he quarterly branch. This is not sound engineering. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239682-21738-NzPbIRuR0n>