Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 13:24:27 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net> Cc: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does anybody need it ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961203132037.7732A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.961203105924.19203C-100000@creator.gu.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Andrew Stesin wrote: > > Hello Serge, > [snip] > > I agree wholeheartly with you here; probably default of up to 2048 > users/group and 16k bytes would be Ok? (Hope it won't be too big > a waste of resources). > Hmm... I thought you could have several lines with one group? Like in: users:*:30000:user1,user2,user3,user4,user5,user6,....,user20 users:*:30000:user21,user22,user23,user24,...user40 etc. Atleast for me it does work. Sander > And another question: what about having /etc/group also > indexed in [s]pwd.db? having more than some 3-4k accounts on a system, > with (supposedly) a separate login group for each, + some people belonging > to several groups -- might cause a considerable slowdown at getgrent(3) > call. > > -- > Best, > Andrew Stesin > > nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.961203132037.7732A-100000>