Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 08:25:25 +0100 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> To: Fifteen <fifteen@inext.hu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapicam Message-ID: <20011123082525.E50629@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20011122205542.0fb2567d.fifteen@inext.hu>; from fifteen@inext.hu on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:55:42PM %2B0100 References: <20011122205542.0fb2567d.fifteen@inext.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2001-11-22, Fifteen écrivait :
> now I'm curious about it's future in FreeBSD. Was it only a quick patch to make it work,
> or will it be maintained by someone? Unfortunately I'm not a programmer, don't even
> know the magic behind scsi, but would be pretty pleased to use it in the future as well.
> Is there anyone out there who can/want/will work on it?
I'll try to maintain it :)
For now the patch is not in a proper state to be committed to -CURRENT.
It hangs at boot time on some machines for a reason yet to be
determined (if people in that case can send me DDB backtraces that would
be very helpful). There is also a command set issue that is solved by a
ugly hack in the current patch, and that should be fixed more properly
by using CAM_NEW_TRAN_CODE and/or making some changes to scsi-cd.
(Unfortunately going to CAM_NEW_TRAN_CODE would mean that the patch
won't work on 4-STABLE anymore.)
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011123082525.E50629>