Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:06:44 +0200 From: Johan van Selst <johans@stack.nl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is security/pinentry not a dependency of security/gnupg Message-ID: <20080623060644.GA81236@mud.stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080622152556.GA18003@sushi.pseudo.local> References: <20080622152556.GA18003@sushi.pseudo.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Tobias Rehbein wrote: > Or is there some way to use gpg without pinentry? You could use security/gnupg1 instead (which is still developed, just a seperate branch), which doens't require pinentry. Ciao, Johan --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREIAAYFAkhfPXIACgkQaOElK32lxTukOwCfU/m9w9nPN/XqqA5jrF2+7FjK fFIAoI8TrJo/GrTvzxV7Z5c5AgKUZzRL =XoK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080623060644.GA81236>