Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:11:20 -0300
From:      H <hm@hm.net.br>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Request for flowtable testers and actionable feedback RE: flowtable usable or not
Message-ID:  <4F546718.1010508@hm.net.br>
In-Reply-To: <20120305063848.GA21419@lonesome.com>
References:  <CAHM0Q_NMACjv6vVtCd6XYjDZNO4zd=hSyYxaEnVPpqB8%2BcoQ0A@mail.gmail.com> <4F544F05.3090108@hm.net.br> <20120305063848.GA21419@lonesome.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB0A01F7398DBCD28C3AC1D09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:28:37AM -0300, H wrote:
>> because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you
>> do not even know how to talk to them
> I've been criticized for saying this to a user before, but I'm going to=

> repeat it here regardless of consequences.
>
> I'm sorry, you (as a user) do not have the right to flame someone in
> this manner and then expect them to listen to further input from you,
> no matter how reasonable your further contributions are.
>
> We are not paid employees, who might have to simply continue to work wi=
th
> you because their business requires it.
>
> I am not speaking for Kip here but I will state that I myself am happy
> to work with users up until I feel I am getting treated like this, at
> which point I feel no further obligation whatsoever to try to help them=
=2E
>
> Executive summary: you are being very rude here.
>
> mcl

well, as they say, as you shout into the woods it comes back ...
who can not stand the echo better hold his peace ...

not withstanding the annulment of my rights ... I grant you the right to
criticize me as you wish

do you mean rude or direct?

I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong

if you think it's not, then make your point

but telling me what I can or not is kind of lame, don't you think so?=20



--=20
H




--------------enigB0A01F7398DBCD28C3AC1D09
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9UZxgACgkQvKVfg5xjCDx6AACdGC5h+AZhYbkKtOACd2AoeW4n
f30An1Noip+jRtajdiFCySD91etYSQ3E
=0ysZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB0A01F7398DBCD28C3AC1D09--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F546718.1010508>