Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:04:40 -0000 From: "Tariq Rashid" <tariq@inty.net> To: <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: squeeze more performance out of natd? Message-ID: <MPENKFCCIIDAJKJJOLBHGEBLCIAA.tariq@inty.net> In-Reply-To: <20020211233939.M63886@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
thanks for the suggestions, ideas and info everyone... i'll start by looking more closely at the source code and looking at what kqueue and kevents actually are (!) before i dive in and change natd. (for all those who suggested ipf/ipnat - yes i know, but unfortunately natd if part of a bigger product which would have to be rewritten - i did think that there would'nt be a problem with doing the NATing in ipnat and the firewalling in ipfw but i understand that ipnat is done _before_ ipfw sees that packets (which makes sense) and this is the wrong way around for us) i'll let you all know how i get on - and post any difficult questions again - thanks tariq intY has automatically scanned this email with Sophos Anti-Virus (www.inty.net) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MPENKFCCIIDAJKJJOLBHGEBLCIAA.tariq>