Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:53:37 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, zont@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geli(8) breaks after a couple hours of uptime Message-ID: <51167101.4010902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130209140733.0b753c60@fabiankeil.de> References: <20130207141833.GA15884@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130207153322.5c371beb@fabiankeil.de> <20130207180153.GX35868@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130208095709.6ae61cff@fabiankeil.de> <20130208114825.GY35868@acme.spoerlein.net> <5114F390.4010302@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgn7PRmBkx3FLnXfOjKzSHi1JEQQ_wc4273oHCmpTCjR1A@mail.gmail.com> <20130209140733.0b753c60@fabiankeil.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 09/02/2013 15:07 Fabian Keil said the following: > It also wouldn't hurt to document why a 64K per-process limit with an > unlimited number of processes per user is considered a good default in > the first place. I don't think that maxproc=unlimited is a good default regardless of memorylocked. OTOH, we have kern.maxprocperuid. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51167101.4010902>