Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:59:52 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Minseok Choi <eraser95@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Via padlock Message-ID: <200709131100.03782.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200709121354.l8CDs1XG083269@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200709121354.l8CDs1XG083269@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote: > padlock_load="YES" > > So there's no need to modify your kernel. I just realised that I checked and amd64 6.2 machine and an i386 -current machine, hence my confusion :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBG6JKb5ZPcIHs/zowRApnGAJ95JYqx5WVKp8lrMWl1ZkS0SO68PgCfdPew bM+e5HVbQqvgobe8vWK869s= =9b1K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200709131100.03782.doconnor>