Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:38:12 -0600 (CST) From: Vaevictus Asmadi <vae@nathanm.office.socket.net> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Albert Yang <albert@achtung.com>, small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0001240834440.25894-100000@nathanm.office.socket.net> In-Reply-To: <l0313030bb4b084f9b373@[194.32.164.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
unless it would be feasible for an unattended /dev/fd0 /dev/fd1 two disk/two fdd situation.... On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Bob Bishop wrote: > At 14:55 +0800 22/1/00, Greg Lehey wrote: > >[...] > >In summary: what else do we need in PicoBSD? Do we need to do it in > >one disk? > > A one-disk PicoBSD is absolutely required for use in unattended situations. > > > -- > Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 > rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0001240834440.25894-100000>