Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 05:44:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 252720] powerpc64 gcc toolchain missing __BYTE_ORDER__ et. al. Message-ID: <bug-252720-227-rqXdpdwfVQ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-252720-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-252720-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252720 --- Comment #4 from Julio Merino,+1 347 694 0576,New York City <jmmv@FreeBS= D.org> --- Created attachment 221660 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D221660&action= =3Dedit Avoid __BYTE_ORDER__ I scanned the stable/12 source tree and found a bunch of files that query __BYTE_ORDER__. Most seem to have provisions for this macro not being defin= ed, but a couple of them do not. The attached patch seems to have helped genera= te a new powerpc64 userland that works well. I do not know if this kind of patch is desired, or if instead sys/endian.h = or something like that should be modified to define __BYTE_ORDER__ in terms of other available macros when the former is detected to be missing. It seems = to me that this would be slightly more robust. There is also the question of how this problem slipped through QA into a release. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-252720-227-rqXdpdwfVQ>