Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:16:08 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <19981203201608.A14870@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <19981203191210.B28037@gvr.org>; from Guido van Rooij on Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 07:12:10PM %2B0100 References: <19981203002629.A26879@klemm.gtn.com> <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com> <19981203085302.B1209@klemm.gtn.com> <19981203191210.B28037@gvr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 07:12:10PM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> > Fully agreed. Fortunately KAME is available for -current as well.
>
> Where did you find that? I only saw 2.2.7 stacks.
Sh.., you're right, I browsed too quickly over the paragraph
yesterday evening.
It's only available for 2.2.7, and therefor Jordan pointed out,
that this is a real disadvantage for 3.0, which is the future...
But from the Webserver:
We have chosen 2.2.x-RELEASE because:
- it is excellent for daily use.
- well-maintained "ports" tree helps us modify applications to support IPv6.
- and 3.0-current is too hard to track if we maintain cvs repository
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
separately.
^^^^^^^^^^
What does that mean ? And if not ?? If they would / could commit their
developement to the -current tree and merge stable stuff to RELENG_2_2 ?!
--
Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
"NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981203201608.A14870>