Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 00:46:57 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: .s -> .S filename change in /sys Message-ID: <200005092346.AAA30494@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> of "Tue, 09 May 2000 15:49:10 PDT." <20000509224910.DC5BD1CE3@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On 09-May-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > > I would like to rename the extension of all the .s files in /sys that need
> > > pre-processing to .S. There are two reasons for this.
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
>
> BTW; this is the file counts of .s vs .S look like:
>
> ashburton[3:44pm]~src-104# find . -name '*.[sS]' > /tmp/s
> ashburton[3:45pm]~src-105# egrep '\.s$' /tmp/s | wc -l
> 96
> ashburton[3:45pm]~src-106# egrep '\.S$' /tmp/s | wc -l
> 208
>
> Repo copying all these .s files to .S will add about 1.7MB to the repo.
>
> I personally would prefer to have everything *.S, but remember that it
> doesn't come for free.
Can't they be repo-moved for free ? Would doing that actually do any
damage (surely both cvs and cvsup'll just delete the .s and create the
.S) ? Am I being naive ?
> Cheers,
> -Peter
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005092346.AAA30494>