Date: 05 Jul 2002 13:45:56 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default ssh protocol in -STABLE [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD-STABLE now has OpenSSH 3.4p1] Message-ID: <xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12> References: <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[moving from -stable to -security, bcc: to -stable and security-team] Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes: > As a lot has changed with OpenSSH in FreeBSD, perhaps now is a good > time to make the 2,1 the default instead ? I'd like that. I think the only reason for the old default was not to surprise users who had the ssh1 RSA host key in their known_hosts but not the ssh2 DSA host key. What do people think about this? Keep 2,1 or revert to 1,2? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_>