Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:08:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245755] [NEW PORT] devel/py-pyotp2289 Pure Python implementation of RFC-2289 - "A One-Time Password System" Message-ID: <bug-245755-21822-Hg5sCM2JGO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245755-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245755-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245755 --- Comment #4 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Simeon Simeonov from comment #3) The only additional thing maintainers can provide is confirmation of QA (portlint, poudriere) which can help to pickup issues early, for more info = and instructions see: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-= testing.html But otherwise no other feedback. People can tell when something needs their response/acknowledgement, if their (bugzilla) email is in the value of a fl= ag (like maintainer-feedback) with the ? value set In the previous change to this issue I made, i changed it from needing feed= back ? to + (provided feedback, in this case, the updated patch) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245755-21822-Hg5sCM2JGO>