Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Apr 2007 03:12:22 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To:        Howard Su <howard0su@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Review] Remove procfs dependency of truss
Message-ID:  <20070404101222.GU61362@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <f126fae00704040118w25a7b291xdcf1b6300bab1ceb@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <f126fae00704040118w25a7b291xdcf1b6300bab1ceb@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Howard Su <howard0su@gmail.com> [070404 01:20] wrote:
> Following the suggestion in idea page, I proposed the attached patch.
> I didn't change any kernel part because I think PTRACE(2) is
> functional although man page didn't document it.
> 
> I tested the patch under i386 and amd64 box. The help on testing and
> code review will be appreciated.

wow, well done!  any draw backs to using ptrace over procfs?

have you tested performance?

-Alfred




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070404101222.GU61362>