Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:00:00 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <774F6E78-54B0-44E2-AA4C-52E24CED2095@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <56437296.9000709@FreeBSD.org> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <56437296.9000709@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 16:53 , Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: >> Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper >>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth >>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port. >>=20 >> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still >> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far >> less intrusive than HPN. >>=20 >=20 > Yes, it's very small. > /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers And thanks to both of you for keeping it. It=E2=80=99s often the best you can get if you have machines which run = w/o firewalls. Just wanted to say =E2=80=9Cthanks=E2=80=9D! /bz=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?774F6E78-54B0-44E2-AA4C-52E24CED2095>