Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:52:50 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore Message-ID: <48D33E32.2030607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200809181545.48487.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <200809181033.56619.jhb@freebsd.org> <48D2A979.7090809@FreeBSD.org> <200809181545.48487.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > Ahh, I think I see now. It requires one OPTIONS using port to mask the > dependencies. Exactly. >> I thought the same thing, probably yes, but I dunno why it was added in >> such way from the beginning, so I tried to create the simplest and >> surely working patch maintaining the current workflow. > > Ok. Probably it was added in such way because at the beginning there wasn't the config-conditional target and runing the config target for every port (re)build was not a bright idea. If I have time I'll try to make a patch following this rationale, but in the meanwhile my previous patch seems good enough. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48D33E32.2030607>