Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 20:28:40 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems after PAO -> 2.2.5 stable Message-ID: <199711021928.UAA05665@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <199711021913.MAA03336@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Nov 2, 97 12:13:11 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > > > > I did that change and it worked. Perhaps it would even be better > > > > to be able to configure the irq the pcic will be using. > > > > > > This is the best solution, but there's no easy solution to implementing > > > it. If you can come up with one I'm all ears/eyes. > > > > Yeah..I've looked at the way it is doen now and it isn't quite easy. > > Right now assigning an IRQ to a device == claiming it's an ISA device. > Why? We could try to assign te irq we want and just fail if it does not work. I do agree it is not as clean as possible, but then again: this is to avoid breakage ;-) > > Anyway, we could introduce an option so at least we can do both ;-) > > Options are evil. :) Bugs are worse. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711021928.UAA05665>