Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 10:10:07 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile src/include Makefile src/release Makefile src/release/picobsd/build Makefile.mfs src/release/picobsd/custom Makefile.mfs src/release/picobsd/dial Makefile.mfs src/release/picobsd/install Makefile.mfs Message-ID: <397F1B6F.46320037@cup.hp.com> References: <200007252213.PAA34677@netplex.com.au> <10733.964597601@localhost> <200007261456.IAA11238@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000726125721.Z51462@jade.chc-chimes.com> <200007261659.KAA11807@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > > Gimme a break Bill. Andrey and Warner (as security officer) has already > explained why we're doing things differently. > > If the other OS's choose to be insecure, then let them. We don't always > have to respond to security issues *after* every one else fixes them. The question I have is why do we then want to change mtree back to the "insecure" behaviour? Clearly, security can not be the driving force here... -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?397F1B6F.46320037>