Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:24:49 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 4.2.0 is coming Message-ID: <20081008082449.GA3741@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <48EC67FF.3030900@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20070518192007.6e6a91e1@kan.dnsalias.net> <20070519022016.2b4a6bda@kan.dnsalias.net> <48EC67FF.3030900@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:57:51AM +0000, O. Hartmann wrote: > Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:20:07 -0400 > > Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> HEADS UP: I will start importing GCC 4.2.0 bits in about one hour and > >> plan to finish in a couple of hours after that. > >> > >> The src/ tree will be utterly broken meanwhile. I'll send an 'all > >> clear' message when done. > > > > Done. > > > > Just for those who aren't on the cutting edge: why gcc 4.2.0 and not > 4.2.1 as it is used in 7.X? Take a close look at the date of the message you were replying to. It is somewhat old. (There seems to have been a mail-server hiccup somewhere.) -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081008082449.GA3741>