Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:06:48 +0200
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Thomas Skibo <thomasskibo@yahoo.com>
Cc:        Thomas Skibo via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PINE64+ 2GB - with U-Boot SPL 2019.10 - bootaa64.efi do not find  UFS partition
Message-ID:  <20191015120648.ca03c451bc95e29f41a336d7@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <15D5331A-C76D-4EBC-8992-9B04A0C0EDC5@yahoo.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:41:55 -0700
Thomas Skibo via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote:

> > 
> > I put FreeBSD-12.1-RC1-arm64-aarch64-PINE64.img on the sd card. It is 
> > created with u-boot 2019-07 and boot correctly.
> > 
> > If I put u-boot 2019-10 the same problem occurs.
> 
> Without r352446, loader.efi cannot work with u-boot 2019.10.  So, a 12.1 image isn?t going to be compatible with u-boot 2019.10.  I?ve verified this on a Zynq board.
> 
> Also, boot1.efi won?t work with u-boot 2019.10 but I tried Emmanuel?s suggestion to use loader.efi directly and that worked.  Then, as an experiment I backed out change r352446 in the loader and I got all the same error messages as Henri.
> 
> 
> ?
> Thomas Skibo
> thomasskibo@yahoo.com

 Yes, thanks for trying 12.1 as I didn't when I updated u-boot.
 tsoome@ did merge the needed commits in stable/12 and will mfc them in
releng/12.1 so 12.1-RELEASE will work with u-boot 2019.10.
 Note that 12.1 will be shipped with u-boot 2019.07 as this is the
version in the latest quarterly but at least it will not break when the
next quarterly will be branched and people update their u-boot based on
it.
 As said in another mail forget boot1.efi, this was never supported on
arm/arm64.

-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>


help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191015120648.ca03c451bc95e29f41a336d7>