Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:06:48 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Thomas Skibo <thomasskibo@yahoo.com> Cc: Thomas Skibo via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PINE64+ 2GB - with U-Boot SPL 2019.10 - bootaa64.efi do not find UFS partition Message-ID: <20191015120648.ca03c451bc95e29f41a336d7@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <15D5331A-C76D-4EBC-8992-9B04A0C0EDC5@yahoo.com> References: <15D5331A-C76D-4EBC-8992-9B04A0C0EDC5@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:41:55 -0700 Thomas Skibo via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote: > >=20 > > I put FreeBSD-12.1-RC1-arm64-aarch64-PINE64.img on the sd card. It is=20 > > created with u-boot 2019-07 and boot correctly. > >=20 > > If I put u-boot 2019-10 the same problem occurs. >=20 > Without r352446, loader.efi cannot work with u-boot 2019.10. So, a 12.1 = image isn?t going to be compatible with u-boot 2019.10. I?ve verified this= on a Zynq board. >=20 > Also, boot1.efi won?t work with u-boot 2019.10 but I tried Emmanuel?s sug= gestion to use loader.efi directly and that worked. Then, as an experiment= I backed out change r352446 in the loader and I got all the same error mes= sages as Henri. >=20 >=20 > ? > Thomas Skibo > thomasskibo@yahoo.com Yes, thanks for trying 12.1 as I didn't when I updated u-boot. tsoome@ did merge the needed commits in stable/12 and will mfc them in releng/12.1 so 12.1-RELEASE will work with u-boot 2019.10. Note that 12.1 will be shipped with u-boot 2019.07 as this is the version in the latest quarterly but at least it will not break when the next quarterly will be branched and people update their u-boot based on it. As said in another mail forget boot1.efi, this was never supported on arm/arm64. --=20 Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191015120648.ca03c451bc95e29f41a336d7>