Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 07:21:04 +0000 From: "jabbaarbarelly (via Twitter)" <i-serrofq-vcsj=serrofq.bet-9efce@postmaster.twitter.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: jabbaarbarelly sent you an invitation Message-ID: <20130502072117.A9071C1E@hub.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
jabbaarbarelly sent you an invitation Twitter helps you stay connected with what's happening right now and with the people and organizations you care about. Accept invitation https://twitter.com/i/b6539abb-c1f7-4bde-9a46-1d7fef3ac4a6 ------------------------ This message was sent by Twitter on behalf of Twitter users who entered your email address to invite you to Twitter. Unsubscribe: https://twitter.com/i/o?t=1&iid=3d328716-0202-48fe-bf15-1ec6877bae40&uid=0&c=ZNV%2BN6G7N7j3H7rtctWKvJ7wxWM4f1r2qRqDmygVoPY%3D&nid=9+26 Need help? https://support.twitter.com From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 3 18:02:31 2013 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C36FE15 for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korodev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1594917FC for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 18:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j3so336125qcs.21 for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=fgZd+B8zAZAk1Vq2c69Q0sPzdssZw7kuZ16lpO590ZE=; b=Q2pYY6m6Tz4dpJDcINptQu3EC1eczxqYowkircPedKlspqulpraxJXI98LsKYw5uQS PZ4IiigO0TmMdJKQqAtak7zTjnfER+o6Rv+8Yt39WJaJZYTqQnYVLSBoAgbSk7mgv0kj miSbrTIjtqpwJ9PQobfD6m8avy6TBu6fZGTJXs7E1auVC6nA4OaCvoQ7Q2Mg/GM4h0Km PAqL4XuLmeGvv2eI5yJzijCZi2fznNYe2ERwHeNGRlfyhLLSBlP/54nKwCyiIYPuBpVX IvOQKhs2ry937802Z21rInuNLNw/LK0683OUUklTx3NRnl4VzpEi19VBQOmakk6VoRxS LiRQ== X-Received: by 10.229.75.194 with SMTP id z2mr4869635qcj.65.1367604150593; Fri, 03 May 2013 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.126.98 with HTTP; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:02:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Korodev <korodev@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 14:02:09 -0400 Message-ID: <CAKOsuLqQep1ZuFXp+pGrGzO_PiAa_ZM9zkrcY+wtnpSmkVeMqA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: IPFW Table Size To: "freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>, <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>, <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 18:02:31 -0000 I currently have some firewall/routing devices running 8.2 and 9.1 with ipfw and I'm interested in blocking large groups of IP addresses. The man pages explain that the table lookup is implemented using a radix tree, but what I'm most interested in is the performance differences in using a single table as opposed to multiple tables split up with N addresses each and what the optimal N (number of addresses in each table) would be. \\korodevhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130502072117.A9071C1E>