Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:26:32 +0900 From: daichi <daichi@ongs.co.jp> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/dovecot pkg-install ports/mail/dovecot/files README.FreeBSD patch-dovecot-example.conf Message-ID: <20030701132632.2a5fb593.daichi@ongs.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030701001754.GA72598@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200306301406.h5UE6Zdd013151@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030630211935.GA71572@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030630220229.GA58820@cus.org.uk> <20030701001754.GA72598@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm a little confused. Does this apply for users and groups were the > > actual numbers don't matter ? In Dovecot the extra user is just used > > as a seperate identity to partition login, authentication and active > > users securely. Or do should all users and groups which are going to > > be added by a port by listed in the Porters Handbook. The handbook > > itself seems to suggest the former. > > So there is nothing in the port or package that hard-codes the value > of the uid at compile or package-time, for example files owned by the > dovecot user? > > If not, it's probably OK. I think there is not uid/gid hard-code in dovecot ports. -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030701132632.2a5fb593.daichi>