Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:27:53 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Radim Kolar <hsn@filez.com> Subject: Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters Message-ID: <CADLo83-qVe4WSz83OYimwt%2BFWh6ojd8Tg8gREJfwpae7qU7Uiw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAL409KzKvGZofXuRhk4q2Y3pYGLwpODoboHOeh_OPKNMNAcJGQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <50017C97.3050200@filez.com> <CADLo83_a=qOqTgGQF%2BLSYyGDaJoT6B2vF9JGV=a2ZHRXRyR6Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL409KzKvGZofXuRhk4q2Y3pYGLwpODoboHOeh_OPKNMNAcJGQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 14 July 2012 16:24, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: >> No-one is exempt from timeouts on ports except secteam and portmgr. > > One problem (at least how it appears to me) is that when a PR gets > automatically assigned to a maintainer who is also a committer, it is > not automatically unassigned if the person is missing for a few > months, and other committers ignore the PR because it is already > assigned. > > This only happened once to me, but it took 6 months for another > committer to notice it. And that was pretty fast, comparing to, say > ports/154456 [1], which is open since 2011-02. > > Is automatic unassignment possible? Technically yes, but it's highly undesirable. You can feel free to bring it up here if you think that's happened. Chrishome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-qVe4WSz83OYimwt%2BFWh6ojd8Tg8gREJfwpae7qU7Uiw>