Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:45:13 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Pdah7o=SCi3s--xD4d9Gry0XYsW4-ASyjeudR@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <741941295699995@web150.yandex.ru> References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> <792051295678832@web120.yandex.ru> <AANLkTi=1_kHKq6=kJEZ8tfWyOPYE1wHeNrQ-cfV9L9bD@mail.gmail.com> <741941295699995@web150.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru>: > 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>: >> So it's all completely stable for you too right now? >> > > Yes, almost 7 hours with new kernel and no errors. > Stable as all previous revisions. > > Wait a 802.11n support to utilize it with my home and office hotspots :) :) That's going to take some time, but it's on the cards. I really need to first figure out exactly why the AR9280/AR9285 support is so unstable for people. There's one user who has reported a regression from if_ath in -8 to what's in HEAD. I'm working with him at the moment to nail down the cause(s). This is why I really do need this tested as much as possible. I'll put up instructions on how to build if_ath as a module (that's what I'm doing on my RELENG_8 EEEPC - I'm running the HEAD if_ath on it for testing on the AR9280) and then sort out any and all issues on the AR5416, AR9160, AR9280 and AR9285. Throwing 11n into the mix right now is just a bit too much for me to take on. :) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=Pdah7o=SCi3s--xD4d9Gry0XYsW4-ASyjeudR>