Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Sep 1999 01:05:57 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf files.i386 src/sys/i386/i386 mp_clock.c 
Message-ID:  <199909200805.BAA29815@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 1999 10:06:53 %2B0200." <21408.937814813@critter.freebsd.dk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199909200752.AAA29722@dingo.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith writes:
> 
> >>   On PIIX4 based SMP systems use the PMTMR register for timecounting.
> >
> >You should be using this on all systems with the PIIX4, not just SMP 
> >systems.
> 
> No, the TSC is far superior on UP, (unless destroyed by APM), it
> has roughly 100 times better resolution and is twice as fast to
> query.

It is, however, as you point out, non-deterministically unreliable. 
I'm fairly certain that we should option out the use of the TSC by 
default - it is simply biting too many people for too little gain.

> Once we get the ACPI stuff rolling we can use the PIIX for APM too.

That would be "use the PIIX for ACPI", since we won't be using APM.

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909200805.BAA29815>