Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:14:10 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind9 - Imported sources Message-ID: <200409201414.10991.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp8yb4ddhe.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200409190130.i8J1UPZN059043@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040920174914.GA91871@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzp8yb4ddhe.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 20 September 2004 02:03 pm, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Why wasn't this imported into src/contrib/bind, following 8 years of SO= P? > > For the same reason you imported bwk's awk into contrib/one-true-awk > instead of contrib/awk: it is a completely different code base. No, it was a different vendor. :) This is the same vendor: ISC, yes? Both= =20 bind4 and bind8 lived in src/contrib/bind. HEAD would be ok if you just=20 turned bind off while you did the import for a few days. Not much point in= =20 doing vendor imports if each version gets its own directory. Might as well= =20 use cvs add at that point. =2D-=20 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =3D http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409201414.10991.jhb>