Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:32:43 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <20020924123242.GB55438@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020923122935.A6108@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <63403.1032725861@critter.freebsd.dk> <20020922204338.GA4971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20020923122935.A6108@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:29:35 +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > > A workaround might be to #undef _POSIX2_VERSION after #include'ing <unistd.h> > in posixver.c but I don't think that would be correct. It's probably better Removing compatibility with +pos f.e. they just try to confirm POSIX, because +N can be filename. > to either change all the scripts that use the obsolescent +pos -pos syntax > to use the new -k syntax or to change _POSIX2_VERSION back to whatever it > was before. I think the second is more realistic. I think changing scripts to use -k syntax will be right solution. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924123242.GB55438>