Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:42:17 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <darrenr@cyber.com.au> To: kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp (KATO Takenori) Cc: darrenr@cyber.com.au, michaelh@cet.co.jp, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/union union_vnops.c Message-ID: <199704161242.WAA10543@plum.cyber.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199704161222.VAA15848@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> from "KATO Takenori" at Apr 16, 97 09:21:59 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#ifdef DIAGNOSTIC In some mail I received from KATO Takenori, sie wrote > > I cannot object against both opinions. > > Kernel hackers may prefer panic to inter-process hang because panic > and stack trace could help to find problems. Most users may prefer > inter-process hang to panic because they can obtain a chance to sync > filesystems. > > I think that we should chose one of them as the case may be. #endif
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704161242.WAA10543>