Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:30:21 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <20020213213021.B5987@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20020213212738.A82456@johncoop.MSHOME>; from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:38PM -0800 References: <20020214011555.F33346-200000@alchemy.oven.org> <20020213210855.A5744@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020213212738.A82456@johncoop.MSHOME>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:27:38PM -0800, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > Since the Athlon/Duron have CMOV and the K6 does not, isn't it > practically a wash? Whatever, scheduling benefits there might be for > using K6 scheduling may be lost by not managing delay slots as well > (since the pentiumpro has CMOV). Of course, this depends on what gcc > 2.95.x actually does in the two cases . . . Well, go and benchmark it appropriately and come back with your results :) Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8a0ttWry0BWjoQKURAk+uAKC9p5Km1yAWRhVVL8R8+EWlmvArVgCcDPwT tp02UH26dtQxLdLgi+afO98= =fr7D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020213213021.B5987>