Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:12:07 +0200 From: Kristof Provost <kristof@sigsegv.be> To: Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r281164 - head/sys/netpfil/pf Message-ID: <20150407081207.GP73237@vega.codepro.be> In-Reply-To: <55237A2D.2000602@beastielabs.net> References: <201504061905.t36J51EX005483@svn.freebsd.org> <55237A2D.2000602@beastielabs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2015-04-07 08:33:17 (+0200), Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net> wrote: > On 04/06/15 21:05, Kristof Provost wrote: > > Author: kp > > Date: Mon Apr 6 19:05:00 2015 > > New Revision: 281164 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/281164 > > > > Log: > > pf: Skip firewall for refragmented ip6 packets > > Is there any chance that this commit and your previous pf and inet6 > related changes will get MFC'd to 10.1-STABLE. Is it safe or even > possible to incorporate these changes myself? > I have no immediate plans to MFC this. There's still a bit of work to be done and a little more testing as well before I'd be comfortable merging this back. For example, I still need to commit https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1815 (although that'll happen soon). I also think there's at least one other bug, but I'll need some more time to investigate that. That said, it is fairly straightforwards to merge these patches back to 10.1. I'm running two stable/10 systems with these patches and I've not seen any issues yet. Regards, Kristof
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150407081207.GP73237>