Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 17:16:37 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: nik@iii.co.uk, Wolfram Schneider <wosch@panke.de.freebsd.org>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.docb.mk Message-ID: <19980826171637.A28336@freno.cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <19980826104603.A10762@iii.co.uk>; from nik@iii.co.uk on Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 10:46:03AM %2B0100 References: <19980825133058.A534@panke.de> <19980826104603.A10762@iii.co.uk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 1998-08-26 10:46:03 +0100, nik@iii.co.uk wrote:
> > A sample makefile for tutorials/devel:
> >
> > DOC= devel
> > VOLUME= tutorials/${DOC}
> > SRCS= ${DOC}.docb
> >
> > .include <bsd.docb.mk>
>
> Sorry, don't like it. Specifically, it assumes that DocBook documents are
> going to have a .docb suffix (something I thought had been discussed
> back in March/April this year).
I can modify bsd.docb.mk so it will work for .sgml and .docb
suffix.
> The body of doc/en/handbook/Makefile can probably be used as a starting
> point. The suffix files for .sgml.html works out the DTD of the source
> .sgml file and then tries to do the right thing (i.e., it converts .sgml
> files that are in the HTML DTD using sgmlnorm, it converts .sgml files
> that are in the DocBook DTD using Jade (although it could use instant).
The DTDs are converted to different formats. linuxdoc create ps,
ascii and HTML. Docbook currently only HTML. I don't know
an easy way to handle this.
> I think using the file suffix to use the DTD is wrong, particularly when
> the website doesn't follow the same rules.
I prefer a makefile variable. E.g.
SGMLDTD=docbook
--
Wolfram Schneider <wosch@freebsd.org> http://freebsd.org/~w/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980826171637.A28336>